There are a great deal of things, let’s face it, that severe watch lovers like to hate, or perhaps it’d be more accurate to state ,”hate on” — that the latter referring to the occasional tendency to dislike something purely on principle. Often, of course, there are reasons the pitchforks and torches come out; among the worst culprits are limited edition watches (which predictably often include little more than a symbol on a dial and also the least cost-intensive possible alteration to the packing ). The dilemma is that a good deal of the time the link to the subject of a limited edition watch appears pretty sparse — and on top of that lots of the time, the design decisions used to tie the watch to the theme of the limited edition just seem kind of obvious. To be entirely honest, though, one sympathizes with all the designers — if someone put a gun to my head and told me to make a limited edition see in party (just as a for instance) the Fourth of July I would struggle not just to avoid utilizing eagles as well as the colours red, white, and blue; I’d struggle to think about anything else. Being told, if you are in the design department, which you need to generate a tie-in limited edition watch on a shoestring budget with zero development time is likely something that pushes watch designers to beverage.
There are a great deal of things, let’s face it, that serious watch fans like to hate, or perhaps it’d be more accurate to state ,”hate on” — the latter referring to the occasional propensity to dislike something purely on principle. Frequently, of course, there are reasons the pitchforks and torches come out; among the worst offenders are themed limited edition watches (which often consist of little more than a logo on a dial and also the least cost-intensive possible alteration to the packing ). The dilemma is that a lot of time the link to the subject of a limited edition watch seems pretty thin — and in addition to that lots of this time, the design decisions used to tie the eye into the theme of this limited edition just seem sort of obvious. To be entirely honest, though, one sympathizes with all the designers — if somebody put a gun to my head and told me to make a limited edition watch in celebration of (as a for instance) the Fourth of July I’d struggle not just to avoid utilizing eagles as well as the colors white, red, and blue; I’d struggle to think of anything else. Being advised, if you’re in the design department, that you need to make a tie-in limited edition watch on a shoestring budget without development time is probably something which drives watch designers to drink.
The first Mark II hasn’t quite risen to the degree of excitement the Speedmaster Professional has attained — it may be as simple as the unparalleled and in this point, inimitable background the Moonwatch enjoys (you can only fly to the Moon for the first time after, after all). However, the Mark II has its own appeal — it’s one of a really impressive set of quite technical, generally large, purpose built tool sequences (the whole Mark series is well worth collecting; there isn’t a flop in the crowd ) and it is generally a less expensive quarry to search compared to a Moonwatch. The one issue is that one of the most attractive facets of the Mark II is that the wonderful sunray cleaning on the case top — alas, one frequently discovers classic Mark IIs which were polished and polished quite carelessly, together with the original end completely destroyed.
Now, the Rio 2016 is a limited variant of 2016 watches that’s a tie-in using Omega speedmaster mark ii co-axial replica watch‘s sponsorship of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games and instead of place the Olympic rings on it, or some other more overt indication of the sponsorship, they have done something quite cleverer, which can utilize three different metals for its sub-dial rings: silver, bronze, and gold (for obvious reasons). The result is that the dial comes with a subdued but quite appealing touch of color to it — not the pure instrumentality of the white and black version or the sporty verve of this racing dial, but its own identity. Don’t get us wrong, we are not saying that this dial variant is the best horological innovation to come down the pike since Mudge place a lever escapement in a watch in 1755, or something. However, it is a laudable instance of a company carrying out a limited edition tie-in without resorting to the obvious, and if you liked the brand new Mark IIs we believe you’re going to like having this sharp looking alternative. The acid test of any limited edition tie-in is if you would wear it regardless of the sponsorship, and after several days of having this on the wrist, we think we can provide it the very best compliment we can provide an LE — we just loved it as a watch.